Merck False Claims Act case dismissed because falsified data about MMR wouldn't have dissuaded the CDC anyway
another day in the upside down...
I read this Defender article this morning…
and immediately thought of this…
That doesn’t mean those dots connect (BigPharma probably doesn’t need Soros to buy them judges)…. I’m just acknowledging what’s happening in my head as I try to make sense of the nonsensical.
So help me make it make sense. From The Defender:
A federal appeals court today dismissed a lawsuit against Merck alleging the company misled the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by “omitting, concealing and misrepresenting” information about the potency of its mumps vaccine.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit upheld a July 2023 U.S. District Court decision in United States ex rel. Krahling v. Merck & Co., which found that even though Merck may have made false claims to the CDC, those claims didn’t play a role in the agency’s decision to purchase the vaccine for its Vaccines for Children Program.
So Merck is off the hook because, even if they falsified data and made false claims about the efficacy of their product, the CDC wouldn’t have done things any differently had they known?
This is SO MUCH WORSE.
In other words, the judges said that even if the evidence shows the government knew about Merck’s misrepresentations and data falsification related to its mumps vaccine because the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was aware of the behavior and the CDC continued to purchase the vaccine with that knowledge, the company was not in violation of the False Claims Act.
So the big mistake here was assuming that the CDC would care about purchasing vaccines for children based on fraudulent data…
“The plaintiff whistleblowers filed this False Claims Act case against Merck in 2010, over 14 years ago. They detailed outrageous fraud upon fraud by Merck, with apparent collusion by the FDA, to falsify the potency of the mumps component in the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine for which Merck held a patent.” - Mary Holland
“Evidently, if the government knows it’s being defrauded, then fraud is OK — regardless of the collateral damage.” - Brian Hooker
I’m trying to wrap my mind around this.
Let’s revisit Merck’s behavior according to the whistleblowers…
Merck is the only manufacturer licensed by the FDA to sell the mumps vaccine in United States, and if it could not show that the vaccine was 95 percent effective, it risked losing its lucrative monopoly, according to the complaint. That's why Merck found it critically important to keep claiming such a high efficacy rate, the complaint states…
…Starting in the late 1990s, Merck set out on its sham testing program with the objective of "report[ing] efficacy of 95 percent or higher regardless of the vaccine's true efficacy," the complaint states.
Chatom says Merck initially called its testing program Protocol 007.
Under Protocol 007, Merck did not test the vaccine's ability to protect children against a "wild-type" mumps virus, which is "the type of real-life virus against which vaccines are generally tested," the complaint states.
Instead, Chatom says, Merck tested children's blood using its own attenuated strain of the virus.
"This was the same mumps strain with which the children were vaccinated," the complaint states.
That "subverted" the purpose of the testing regime, "which was to measure the vaccine's ability to provide protection against a disease-causing mumps virus that a child would actually face in real life. The end result of this deviation ... was that Merck's test overstated the vaccine's effectiveness," Chatom claims.
Merck also added animal antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results, though it knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies, and that the antibodies created a laboratory testing scenario that "did not in any way correspond to, correlate with, or represent real life ... virus neutralization in vaccinated people," according to the complaint.
Chatom claims that the falsification of test results occurred "with the knowledge, authority and approval of Merck's senior management." And as Merck's vaccine is the only game in town, the vaccine's "significantly degraded" quality means "there has remained a significant risk of a resurgence of mumps outbreaks," Chatom says in its complaint.
It claims that the degraded quality of the Merck vaccine played a role in a 2006 mumps outbreak in the Midwest, and in another outbreak in 2009. Those outbreaks caused the Centers for Disease Control to push back its target date for eradicating the disease from 2010 to no earlier than 2020, the complaint states. (emphasis mine)
Meanwhile, the CDC reports that mumps outbreaks continue to occur - primarily in vaccinated people. Looks like they need to push their target date for eradicating mumps again…
Andy Wakefield recently released a corporate thriller based on the real life events surrounding Protocol 7. It’s worth a watch.
So how is this vaccine STILL being given to children and required for school?
It’s difficult to fathom. But some people are painting a bigger picture in which decisions like these make more sense, since their explanations take into account the apparent disregard for fraud and poor health outcomes.
In this video, Katherine Watt offers a troubling explanation. She also sets up a compelling and comprehensive timeline of laws and loopholes that may help explain how we got here.
The basic idea is that public health has been militarized and the military has been turned into a public health front or Potemkin Village such that they’re using public health laws and public health language to carry out a military campaign. And I would not call them DOD vaccines. I would call them DOD weapons…
3:45 The way that the pharmaceutical method is primarily useful to them is that plausible deniability is much easier and legal impunity is much easier. They can achieve the same goal of killing lots of people without their fingerprints being all over it.
Dark, I know. But even if she’s correct, there’s hope
15:10 There are things that the globalists do not like. They don’t like constitutions and charters. They don’t like the conflicting statutory frameworks around bioterrorism, war crimes, genocide, torture… They don’t like when states and provinces and counties and towns pass their own laws protecting informed consent…. protecting people for consumer safety. They actually put out a report in October 2022… state laws limiting protections hazardous for our health. And there’s a whole bunch of things that states have started doing that the globalists do not like. So doing more of those things - more bringing control back to the state, more using Article 10 of the Constitution to reclaim state authority. Those are all extremely useful.
And I do think it’s gonna break. I think there’s going to be a tipping point and the criminal prosecutions are going to start. And we have all the evidence.
In the meantime, we can use the choices we have wisely as we continue to shine light.
Have been awaiting the outcome of this lawsuit for years. Those judges don’t deserve to be on the bench, at least not in a functioning society. The end users, those that received the shots were certainly defrauded in that they had a reasonable expectation that they would be prevented from contracting mumps. So fraud has been perpetrated on them by both Merck and the federal government.