Negative Phase Theory: Some Questions
Negative Phase Theory: Some Questions
can we answer them before another shot goes into another baby?
I’m not going to pretend I have all the answers. I definitely don’t. But I’m revisiting some questions.
This was a big one I had back in January 2021..
Here is a 1932 paper, originally brought to my attention by immunologist Tetyana Obukhanych, that discusses concerns about a "negative phase" described as a “period of increased susceptibility to infection following immediately on prophylactic inoculation by vaccines…”
It stuck with me as I listened to Paul Offit's explanation of his concerns around antibody dependent enhancement (at around the 10 minute mark)
So you have the neutralizing antibodies and you have the binding antibodies. You want to make sure that the quantity of the neutralizing antibodies that you have, and the persistence of those antibodies, is much greater than the binding antibodies. Because the binding antibodies could be dangerous and cause something called “antibody-dependent enhancement.”
And we’ve seen that. We saw that with the dengue vaccine… The dengue vaccine, in children who’ve never been exposed to dengue before, actually made them worse when they were then exposed to the natural virus. Much worse. Causing something called dengue hemorrhagic shock syndrome. Children died because vaccinated children who were less than 9 years of age who had never been exposed to dengue before were more likely to die if they’d been vaccinated than if they hadn’t been vaccinated… And that was because of antibody-dependent enhancement.
Because what happens is, those binding antibodies, they don’t neutralize the virus, they just bind to it. Now we have on our cells something called an Fc receptor which then can allow the antibody, will bind the antibody and bring the virus into the cell. It’s actually a more efficient way for the virus to enter the cell than otherwise. So what you’re doing by creating all these antibodies is potentially causing this antibody-dependent enhancement which could potentially worsen the problem if you then were expose to wild-type or natural virus.
(And, not for nothing, but they knew that BEFORE they released THAT vaccine, too)
So... taking Offit’s concerns about binding vs. neutralizing antibodies into consideration and keeping in mind historical references to periods of increased susceptibility to infection immediately following vaccination, compare the pace at which binding antibodies (top row) and neutralizing antibodies (bottom) row develop in Pfizer’s clinical trial data, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in December of 2020.
Isn’t this suggestive of a problem? At least for the first few weeks? Based on this graphic it looks like binding antibodies turn up well before neutralizing antibodies.
I could be missing something or misunderstanding something, but I was never able to get another explanation of what’s happening here.
And since that time, I witnessed first hand as spikes and upticks in cases would repeatedly follow mass vaccination campaigns. And I wasn’t the only one.
Nobel laureate Luc Montenier tried to warn us early on (may he rest in peace).
We have the hit pieces to prove it.
Geert Vanden Bossche continues to warn us…
And we still have a chance to stop this nonsense before we inflict harm on the youngest among us…
So, if I’m misunderstanding this… and if all of these people are wrong, can someone answer the question before we move on?
This isn't the first time Offit has spoken out about his concerns for boosters. And why wouldn't he? He is along with Dr Stanley Plotkin one of the leading vaccine experts (FWIW) in the world. He knows everything that Gert VDB and others have been saying about ADE. Maybe his venture into maverick land is an attempt to cover his own butt. Coming from the author of Deadly Choices - How the anti-vaccine movement threatens us all, anything he says against using a vaccine should set off alarm bells. And it seems as if some of his followers may have taken notice since this warning about jabbing babies. A very low percentage of parents are electing to offer their little ones up for the experiment. But the government just placed a huge order costing a few billion. Are we to expect another push this fall?
The babies