Now That There Are "New and Improved" Vaccines...
We can finally learn the truth about the sh*t they've been giving us.
FINALLY! Someone is acknowledging that the risk of adverse events may be creating vaccine hesitancy.
A new report from National Geographic has shone a light on topic only months ago was seen as too taboo to speak about on social media—serious vaccine side effects.
As the US FDA continues to evaluate bringing in shots for children under 5, it looks to be a competition between the offerings of Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) and BioNTech SE (NASDAQ:BNTX), and Moderna Inc. (NASDAQ:MRNA).However, with stories like those found in the National Geographic piece, and lingering public concerns over mRNA technology could open the door for up-and-coming entries being developed by innovators such as BioVaxys Technology Corp. (CSE:BIOV) (OTCQB:BVAXF), and Novavax, Inc. (NASDAQ:NVAX).
Due to the 2005 the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, sufferers can’t sue vaccine manufacturers, including the lead example in the National Geographic story whose life was allegedly impacted by Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) and BioNTech SE (NASDAQ:BNTX). New preventative therapies are in development that are built upon safer mechanisms.
Who in the mainstream would be brave enough to admit that real adverse reactions might be to blame for both vaccine hesitancy and injuries, you ask?
Why an investor platform promoting an early stage biotech company that’s developing it’s own vaccine technology, of course.
Among these developments, Biovaxys is advancing multiple breakthrough vaccines based on its unique, patented haptenized viral protein technology, including vaccines for both SARS-CoV-2 and ovarian cancer.
Now that some new players are offering a different “solution”, and the new solution is a vaccine, the scientific community can acknowledge that there are some real problems with the mRNA technology they’ve been pushing on everyone and are trying to approve for young children.
There have been several local and systemic adverse events associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, with pericarditis, myocarditis and myocardial infarction as examples of cardiac complications related to these vaccines.
A study published in the Journal of Hematological Oncology concludes that the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor and that this binding of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2 prevents the enzyme from converting angiotensin II, potentiating cardiac issues.
By the way, this is what’s called “biological plausibility.” In other words, there’s a scientific explanation for all of those strokes and heart attacks that people are having after getting their jabs. The fact that people are getting them after their jabs; that’s called “temporal association”. The fact that so many people are experiencing similar adverse events; that’s consistency/repetition and speaks to the strength of the association. Sounds alarmingly close to causality. Just sayin’
Many of us have been trying to sound the alarm about this for a while…
If it takes a pharmaceutical showdown to bring Pfizer down, so be it. Let’s just get the truth out there.
NatGeo no way. And the article was informative and comprehensive to boot. They even talked about the differences between filing claims to CICP vs the VICP for vaccine injuries. Thanks for the heads up on both of these articles!