The Fact-Checkers Doth Protest Too Much, Methinks
The Fact-Checkers Doth Protest Too Much, Methinks
"there is no evidence" sounds sillier and sillier
I’m rethinking “fact-checkers” lately.
Maybe they’re an asset after all. As the narrative gatekeepers, they readily reveal what must be protected at all costs.
Their tools are easily recognizable.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m in no way supportive of a $2.6 billion censorship campaign disguised as a program to combat disinformation. But they’re getting sloppy. Their persistent and aggressive dismissal/denial is increasingly transparent and their arguments… well they don’t really have any. At least not when it comes to science.
There are dozens, if not hundreds, of stories on this one site alone, countering any claim that might put COVID jabs (or any vaccine) in a negative light. It’s a giant, well-funded game of Whack-a-Mole. At this point, we may convince more people simply by getting people to follow the fact-checkers and read their desperate misrepresentations and flimsy arguments. Denial in every flavor simply points harder to an avalanche of tragedy and speculation that these folks are clearly unwilling to consider in any meaningful way.
Eventually, you can’t help noticing fact-checkers circling like sharks each time an inconvenient story manages to evade the censors. Typically, the story is promptly stamped “Misinformation” or “Not Verified” with the assertion that "there is no evidence.”
Each time a story tries to present new research that provides biological plausibility the real world data that is being collected by the CDC, LeadStories is there to remind us that “there is no evidence.” They must get tired of repeating it each time someone tries to present new evidence.
I mean, how many times do fact-checkers have to remind scientists who point to evidence suggesting that vaccines may be linked to immune system degradation that Covid vaccines don’t cause cancer?
They must be wondering why doctors and scientist insist on addressing the potential for these shots to create pathological vulnerabilities in people’s immune systems that might allow disease processes to set in when they’ve already TOLD us that that isn’t a thing. (People “die suddenly” for no reason every day. Science is full of coincidences. Stop trying to figure it out - they have “experts” for that.)
Professional fact-checkers must be so frustrated that these rogue doctors and scientists don’t simply parrot the assertions of the CDC, which has maintained that these shots are “safe and effective” since before they were even introduced, regardless of what those reporting to their surveillance system have to say.
How many times must we be reminded that renowned cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough, and MIT researcher, Stephanie Seneff, are not the right kind of expert?
One of the doctors who wrote the ScienceDirect article, Peter A. McCullough, M.D., is not a vaccinologist nor an immunologist. Baylor University Medical Center, where he was a cardiologist, fired him when he became a major spreader of COVID misinformation and filed a million-dollar suit against him for using the university's name when making claims like this about COVID vaccines.
How was Dr. McCullough, one of the most published medical experts in his field, a “major spreader” of COVID misinformation? According to the LA Times, Dr. McCullough “questioned the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and advised pregnant women and recovered COVID patients against taking them — advice that runs counter to that of the medical establishment.”
And we all know that doctors cannot give advice that runs counter to the medical establishment.
The second author, Stephanie Seneff, is only a senior research scientist at MIT. And LeadStories already “debunked” her by pointing out that she “offered no proof that the COVID-19 vaccines have possible side effects.”
According Seneff’s research:
[B]oth the mRNA vaccines and the DNA vector vaccines may be a pathway to crippling disease sometime in the future. Through the prion-like actionof the spike protein, we will likely see an alarming increase in several major neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease, CKD, ALS and Alzheimer’s, and these diseases will show up with increasing prevalence among younger and younger populations, in years to come.
…Unfortunately, we won’t know whether the vaccines caused this increase because there will usually be a long time separation between the vaccination event and the disease diagnosis.
Seems like something we might want to be curious about before injecting every person on the planet. But that’s just me. Or is it?
Am I really the only one who thinks of Nathan Thurm every time a fact-checker comes along?
This may be a once you see it, you can’t unsee it kind of thing. More and more people, discovering that they’ve been lied to, are beginning to seek out the censored information so they can decide for themselves. Once that happens, the jig is up.
Maybe we just keep giving fact-checkers the rope. They seem better at crafting nooses than reins.
A year ago a very close friend of mine died a few months after his second injection from Creutzfeld Jacob, a prion disease very similar to Mad Cow. I researched any studies I could find on the connection between this disease and mRNA which led me to a conversation with Dr Bart Classen. What an interesting bright fellow who told me some very compelling things. He used to work directly with Fauci and knows a great deal about his dirty deeds done dirt cheap.