The Lobby against Bobby
defenders of medical groupthink vs. defenders of health and freedom
This week, the Committee to Protect Health Care is recruiting doctors to do what doctors in this country are regularly asked to do: regurgitate the mainstream medical narrative to preserve a status quo that digs us deeper into the current health crisis. This time they’re asked to defend medical groupthink by denouncing one of its biggest threats: Robert F. Kennedy Jr..
The self-appointed “trusted voices” of medicine are currently asking their 20,000+ members to sign this form letter opposing RFK Jr’s appointment to Secretary of Health and Human Services.
From their letter:
The health and well-being of 336 million Americans depend on leadership at HHS that prioritizes science, evidence-based medicine, and strengthening the integrity of our public health system. RFK Jr. is not only unqualified to lead this essential agency–he is actively dangerous. We urge the Senate to protect and defend our patients' access to quality health care by rejecting his appointment.
“Evidence-based medicine” like a growing childhood vaccination schedule that has never been properly safety tested? None of the vaccines the CDC recommends for children were licensed by the FDA based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial. You can view Informed Consent Action Network’s detailed and cited chart providing that evidence here.
And “actively dangerous” how?
RFK Jr. has a well-documented history of spreading dangerous disinformation on vaccines and public health interventions, leaving vulnerable communities unprotected and placing millions of lives at risk.
Apparently “dangerous disinformation” is anything that challenges this:
Vaccines are among the greatest medical breakthroughs in history, saving millions of lives and transforming communities worldwide. The polio vaccine, for instance, prevented 20 million cases of paralysis in American children and has nearly eradicated the disease. Similarly, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been shown to completely prevent cervical cancer–an achievement once thought impossible.
I guess they’re not fans of Dissolving Illusions. Both the book and the process. And it appears they’re not up-to-date on the HPV vaccine science either.
However, if the science truly supports their assertions, The Committee to Protect Health Care has nothing to fear.
Here’s what Kennedy has to say about his plans to Make America Healthy Again:
I’m not going to take away anyone’s vaccines. I’m not anti-vaccine.
If vaccines are working for somebody, I’m not going to take them away. People ought to have choice and that choice ought to be informed by the best information. So I’m going to make sure the scientific safety studies and efficacy studies are out there and people can make individual assessments about whether that product is going to be good for them.
Kennedy repeatedly asserts that he would like to look at the available data and conduct the proper science to get to the bottom of our current health crisis and ensure the safety and efficacy of available. Why would doctors object to this?
If doctors are comfortable letting the NIH spend $3.7 million to study monkeys and gambling, millions more to study monkeys on meth, $477,000 to research “transgender” monkeys and $549,000 to see if lobotomized cats can walk on treadmills, surely they can get behind proper safety studies for the vaccines we give our children.
The Babylon Bee nails it here.
"RFK Jr. is a nut and his ideas are crazy," said FDA employee Sharon Wilmington, as she slapped a "Heart Healthy" sticker on a box of Froot Loops. "We obviously have this thing under control."
And while, the Babylon Bee is parody, the medical establishment’s fear of informed consent and parental choice is very real. Here is former acting CDC director Dr. Richard Besser saying “The idea that receiving vaccines would be parental choice scares me.”
But it’s not just doctors.
In his excellent piece, Joshua Stylman shows us what the screeching protests against RFK Jr. throughout the media are really about:
(I recommend reading the post in its entirety and subscribing to his Substack)
As I often do on Sunday mornings, I was drinking my coffee and scrolling through my news feed when I noticed something striking. Maybe it's my algorithm, but the content was flooded with an unusual amount of vitriol directed at Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s nomination as HHS Secretary. The coordinated messaging was impossible to miss—talking heads across networks uniformly labeling him a "conspiracy theorist" and "danger to public health," never once addressing his actual positions. The media’s concerted attacks on Kennedy reveal more than just their opinion of his nomination—they expose a deeper crisis of credibility within institutions that once commanded public trust.
…You can almost hear the editorial conveyor belt opening as senior editors craft the day’s approved reality for their audience. The consistent tone across pieces reveals less independent analysis than a familiar pattern—mockingbird media still in action. As I detailed in How The Information Factory Evolved, this assembly-line approach to reality manufacturing has become increasingly visible to anyone paying attention. What these gatekeepers fail to grasp is that this smug dismissiveness, this refusal to engage with substantive arguments, is precisely what fuels growing public skepticism. Their panic seems to grow in direct proportion to Kennedy's proximity to real power. This orchestrated dismissal is more than a journalistic flaw—it reflects a larger institutional dilemma, one that becomes unavoidable as Kennedy gains traction.
…Senator Elizabeth Warren declared this week: “RFK Jr. poses a danger to public health, scientific research, medicine, and health care coverage for millions. He wants to stop parents from protecting their babies from measles and his ideas would welcome the return of polio.” Yet this alarmist framing dodges the simple question Kennedy actually raises: Why wouldn't you want proper safety testing for chemicals we're expected to inject into our children's bodies? The silence in response to this basic inquiry speaks volumes about institutional priorities—and their fear of someone with the power to demand answers.
That’s what the lobbying is about.
They can’t give Bobby the power to demand answers.
But if they’re really worried about undermining vaccine confidence, I have some advice for them:
The people who raise concerns about vaccines are not enemies of science. They are its conscience. Listen to them.
They're saying exactly what people that have medical tyranny on their list of things to do, would say. Oh THAT conflict of interest! Concerned about "public health" are they? Iatrogenesis is the fifth leading cause of death worldwide, and third in the USA! How's that for a scorecard?!
This translates to approximately 250,000 deaths per year, or roughly 700 deaths per day. And OBTW, that statistic is before they viciously murdered however many people with their mRNA poison, by all manner of force and intimidation.
If you ask the people that put that on, they would be delighted if the full force of government violence were used to implement their experimental genocide.
I think the Committee to Protect Health Care just popped up as a Dem party astroturf organization.