There is a lot to unpack in this post. What stands out is "“The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development..." So, no one at the regulatory agencies have reviewed the recently uncovered Pfizer document on miscarriages? I'm left speechless after reading the contradictory propaganda from so-called "health authorities".
Plus, we have the obligatory message from NatGeo correlating spike in still births and pre-terms with global warming. "Look here, don't look there"
There is a lot to unpack in this post. What stands out is "“The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development..." So, no one at the regulatory agencies have reviewed the recently uncovered Pfizer document on miscarriages? I'm left speechless after reading the contradictory propaganda from so-called "health authorities".
Plus, we have the obligatory message from NatGeo correlating spike in still births and pre-terms with global warming. "Look here, don't look there"
Yes, plenty of excuses for absence of data, but zero explanation for why the shots were so aggressively promoted despite that absence of data….
And always the redirect propaganda articles. Remember when we all thought National Geographic was the greatest? (At least I did)
I was a long-time subscriber to NatGeo. I cancelled my subscription some years ago after they went "woke".
Thank you Ann for being a voice of reason in this dystopian nightmare we’re living in 🙏
Thank you. We need each other. Witnessing this together makes the burden more tolerable for all of us, doesn’t it?