5 Comments

You are very likely correct. They are not our friends, whatever loyalty and concern that they have for us, is because of the milk of human kindness (which COVID pretty clearly dried up and spoiled.) and not because of any institutional incentives or orientation to individual citizens (we are n to their patients.

More crudely, we are of of interest to them only so far as we comply with their injections, many of them want us Dead whether or not we take the jabs. Whether for jab benchmarks, financial incentives, personal ego, or personal, professional, or political animus, they couldn't care less about us.

Expand full comment
author

Sadly, I agree with you. I'm always relieved when an MD can see this. Thank you for stepping outside of the aggressive echo chamber.

Expand full comment

You are welcome, I have only within the last 4 years been so much of an iconoclast, wish I had awakened earlier to the vaccine scam, though I did practice family centered maternity care when I did OB back in the day.

Expand full comment

The thing to look for would be to see if there's an uptick of people with skin issues, since the rollout of the COVID-19 diseases -- before all the monkey pox nonsense fired up.

I would assume there would be. I just haven't looked into it yet.

The only thing that strikes me as odd about the whole monkey pox bit, is that they were just saying how it was not really an issue, then they flip the script, and now it's a big issue again.

You would imagine that "the science" would be questioned by more people when they keep going back and forth with all of this. Just like Fauci with the masks. You don't need them, then you do, now you need two! It's just stupid at this point.

Expand full comment
author

I've definitely seen an uptick of shingles and other skin issues in the Covid era - particularly since the jab rollout. Skin issues are a side effect of the vaccines as well, so it will be easy to bury or amplify case numbers as needed.

And as far as the script goes, seeding the narrative is part of the playbook.

1. Distant, unlikely threat we're keeping an eye on it.

2. Signs of increasing threat. Scientists have created these controversial technologies/ideas, but they may still be too controversial (geoengineering, mRNA, experimental treatments). We're being responsible, but vigilant "just in case".

3. New stories of how disease can spread. It may be worse than we thought. (ie. I recall a story about how people were getting Hep B and HIV from dental equipment that was not properly sterilized.)

4. Oh no! Mutation, variant, global warming, melting icecaps thawing old scary viruses, threats caused by international travel. We might have to introduce emergency measures!

5. We might have to create mandates and lockdowns because unless everyone is subjected to our solutions they won't work. And we need to remove informed consent for clinical trials so science can proceed to come up with more "solutions".

6. Thanks to non-compliance and unanticipated issues, our measures didn't work and we need to impose new solutions and give more shots.

Sadly, to many, those of us trying to reveal the narrative have become "the enemy" - dangerous conspiracy theorists that no one should listen to. As long as that tactic is successful, the playbook will continue to work. :(

Expand full comment