Public Health seeds our consciousness and our bodies with pathology
public health policy perpetuates cultural and physiological autoimmunity
Lately I can’t stop seeing parallels between vaccines, public health policy and war. And how all of it is destroying us. The “defeat the enemy” paradigm that drives these things calls for a level of hypervigilance and knee-jerk response that is ultimately pathological, regardless of any stated goal.
I’m watching this hypervigilance weaken us, both culturally, psychologically and physiologically, as we dedicate all of our resources to armor, surveillance, avoidance and internal and external war games.
People who are hypervigilant are constantly on guard and prone to overreaction. They maintain an intense and sometimes obsessive awareness of their surroundings, frequently scanning for threats or routes of escape.
Hypervigilance is about more than just being extra vigilant. It is a state of extreme alertness that undermines the quality of life.
If you are hypervigilant, you are always looking for hidden dangers, both real and presumed. Because of this, hypervigilance can leave you exhausted while interfering with interpersonal relationships, work, and your ability to function on a day-to-day basis.
https://www.verywellmind.com/hypervigilance-2797363
Despite spending significantly more on health care than other countries, we’re more drained and inflamed than ever.
And it shows.
The United States spends more on health care than any other high-income country but still has the lowest life expectancy at birth and the highest rate of people with multiple chronic diseases, according to a new report from The Commonwealth Fund, an independent research group.
How has public health contributed to this state? In his 2-part essay, Vaccine Fundamentalism—War Metaphors in the COVID-19 Response, Vaccine Policy and Public Health, Nate Doromal explains:
Public health officials themselves disseminate the war mentality with the repeated message: We are at war with an invisible enemy that must be eradicated. War mentality emphasizes the need for self-sacrifice in order to stop Covid-19 spread. And the weapons of war are glorified; public health authorities glorify its chief weapon of vaccination.
Like any war, there is collateral damage. The collateral damage here are the bedrocks of medical ethics, informed consent, human rights, civil liberties, and even science itself. How can proper science be conducted when one goal, “deliver a vaccine at warp-speed,” is emphasized over healthy scientific skepticism and public discourse? The ultimate collateral damage, of course, is among those damaged or injured by decisions resting on faulty science.
We are witnessing the militarization of public health. Weaponized health care has reduced medicine to shots, mass vaccinations, fast-tracked, emergency-use pharmaceutical products, propaganda, mandates, lockdowns, surveillance and censorship. And public health is, in turn, injecting this militarization into our bodies.
A Cycle of Mistrust
Fear hijacks our instincts, our ability to make good decisions and even our immune systems, transforming countries, communities, people and proteins into “anti” bodies that are poised to fight. When this happens, all of our energy and attention is directed towards a looming threat.
When we, as a nation, believe we are surrounded by enemies, we lose faith in humanity and we’re more inclined to hand over our rights (and a good chunk of our income) in exchange for the “protection” of our government. When then give governments permission to destroy our enemies.
When we, as individuals, don’t trust our instincts and our immune systems, we’re more likely to hand over medical decision-making to public health authorities and the medical establishment for promised protection against emerging health threats. But note that public health messaging and goals are NOT about making you healthy. They’re about changing your behavior (getting you vaccinated) and enlisting you in a war against an invisible enemy. (On a cellular level, we’re now getting “messaging” right into our DNA via synthetic messenger RNA.)
Public health assumes that a population health is dependent an extensive schedule of vaccines in order to be “healthy.” It also assumes that we must defer to authorities when determining what constitutes a threat (hint: they come with lucrative pharmaceutical “solutions” or result in a removal of rights that would not otherwise be acceptable). In fact, public health now identifies people (anti-vaxxers), vaccine hesitancy and “misinformation” (aka any information that may result in vaccine hesitancy) as threats.
Hypervigilance in public health is mass testing asymtomatic people to determine whether they are “sick” and then isolating them. It’s testing wastewater for health threats. Hypervigilance is masking children and closing schools to “stop the spread.”
Macrocosm, meet Microcosm
But this isn’t just a cultural or even a psychological phenomenon. We’re now mainlining trauma. Through the vaccination program, public health wages war on our biology as well.
Vaccines hijack our immune systems to identify and attack “enemies” based on biological directions. This cellular hypervigilance lends to inflammation and overreactions of our immune and nervous systems (think cytokine storms and problems then end in -itis). These traumatic responses drain our resources and can lead to autoimmune issues as our own bodies turn against us.
Both vaccines and fear-based public health propaganda create a level of somatic paranoia that makes it to difficult to discern friend from enemy. People are reduced to “disease carriers.” Air, water, food, and animals are reduced to health threats. Through a public health lens, nature and relationships are potentially dangerous and require testing, surveillance… masks and social distancing.
This kind of existence deprives us of nourishment, rest and joy.
Because if we’re always on the lookout for an enemy, we’ll find enemies all around you. And when we misidentify enemies, we can sabotage ourselves.
Shots as Trauma
Consider how vaccines are designed to work. Vaccines supposedly train our bodies to identify and defeat target pathogens by introducing an antigen - typically a weakened or dead microbes or identifying features of perceived pathogens (ie. spike protein), traditionally with a neurotoxic adjuvant (i.e. aluminum), to elicit an immune response (production of antibodies) that prepare the body for next confrontation with that antigen. But since these shots are one-size-fits-all, some will respond unfavorably and experience immune dysregulation, which may be persistent, even permanent. Furthermore, we are learning that an effective immune response relies on more than just antibodies… and, when it comes to making antibodies, more is not always better.
Dr. Thomas Cowan explains:
“The deliberate provocation of antibodies without prior cell-mediated activity produces an imbalance in our immune system and a state of excessive antibody production. This excessive antibody production actually defines autoimmune disease.”
Vaccines train our bodies to override their innate wisdom in favor of limited pharmaceutical instructions that can render our bodies confused or unarmed when confronted with a new variant or pathogen. Because, unfortunately, the vaccination program doesn’t just underestimate our immune systems. It underestimates all of nature. And since nature has its own intelligence, pathogens regularly evolve to evade vaccine protection.
Furthermore, vaccines have been linked to the destruction of the gut microbiome, which is increasingly linked to healthy immune response. (It turns out Andrew Wakefield was onto something.)
Have Public Health agencies thought this through?
Given increasing evidence that vaccines do not make us healthy, shouldn’t we stop and reconsider this aggressive and invasive approach? Is it possible we’re going about this all wrong?
Public health agencies continue to push for more funding for mass vaccination for measles, mumps, chicken pox and other acute febrile infections, but a growing body of science suggests that avoiding acute symptoms may be walking us into a chronic disease epidemic.
Vaccinating against common childhood infections may actually depriving us of opportunities to prime our immune systems and reduce cancer risks.
Exposures to febrile infectious childhood diseases were associated with subsequently reduced risks for melanoma, ovary, and multiple cancers combined, significant in the latter two groups. Epidemiological studies on common acute infections in adults and subsequent cancer development found these infections to be associated with reduced risks for meningioma, glioma, melanoma and multiple cancers combined, significantly for the latter three groups. Overall, risk reduction increased with the frequency of infections, with febrile infections affording the greatest protection.
According to Children’s Health Defense:
Immunologic dysregulation—including dysfunction of the type brought about by vaccination—is associated not just with autoimmunity but also with cancer, and childhood cancers are skyrocketing. In contrast, many of the once-universal childhood illnesses were, in fact, protective against various cancers. Stated another way, acute infections, and especially those that caused fever, were historically “antagonistic to cancer.” For example:
Naturally acquired mumps engendered immunity to ovarian cancer through antibodies against a cancer-associated antigen.
Individuals who experienced fever-inducing infectious illnesses in childhood (such as rubella and chickenpox) had a lower risk of non-breast cancers, including melanoma and ovarian cancer.
Acute childhood infections protected against Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and measles, in particular, protected against non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Perhaps this is why scientists have been studying some of these “oncolytic viruses” for use in cancer treatments.
Viruses that replicate selectively in neoplastic tissues (oncolytic viruses) hold considerable promise as novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of human malignancies and many such agents are currently under investigation, both in preclinical studies and in human clinical trials.
Returning to our Roots. And our Guts
Healing requires rest, nutrition and the integrity of our bodily systems (immune, nervous, respiratory, gastrointestinal/microbiome, endocrine etc.). When we exert all of our energy avoiding “threats”, we miss opportunities to cultivate these systems. When we perceive natures as threatening, we miss opportunities to be nourished by it.
Real healing takes guts. And by guts, I mean a healthy and diverse microbiome, a return to our instincts and the courage to take responsibility for our our health choices.
Let’s spend a little less time defeating the enemy and more time supporting our innate healing abilities.
Powerful & informative - GOD bless you ATR ...
Outstanding essay, Ann. You have drawn a big picture for us to reflect on.
My friends @Katewand and her husband Will have written a powerful essay which reflects on the sad fact that many in the medical freedom movement are now shamefully siding with Jew-hating terrorists. https://katewand.substack.com/p/the-day-team-reality-died?