There are so many more. The WHO also redefined "causality" ..."In the new causality assessment, only reactions that have previously been acknowledged in epidemiological studies to be caused by the vaccine, are classified as a vaccine-product–related-reactions. Reactions observed for the first time during post-marketing surveillance (Phase 4 clinical trial) are not considered as ‘consistent with causal association with vaccine’. All new serious adverse reactions are labelled as coincidental events ‘inconsistent with causal association,’ or ‘unclassifiable’ and the association with vaccine is not acknowledged. (5). It has, in effect, made phase 4 trials redundant."
I was noticing some branch Covidians on Twitter defending the changes in definitions like it’s a perfectly normal thing to do. That’s why I refer to this silly saga as Stupid 19.
There are so many more. The WHO also redefined "causality" ..."In the new causality assessment, only reactions that have previously been acknowledged in epidemiological studies to be caused by the vaccine, are classified as a vaccine-product–related-reactions. Reactions observed for the first time during post-marketing surveillance (Phase 4 clinical trial) are not considered as ‘consistent with causal association with vaccine’. All new serious adverse reactions are labelled as coincidental events ‘inconsistent with causal association,’ or ‘unclassifiable’ and the association with vaccine is not acknowledged. (5). It has, in effect, made phase 4 trials redundant."
https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l2268/rr-0
el gato malo nails it here. https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/sunlight-not-gaslight?r=gt86w&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I was noticing some branch Covidians on Twitter defending the changes in definitions like it’s a perfectly normal thing to do. That’s why I refer to this silly saga as Stupid 19.
Really? Do you remember what changes they found reasonable and why? It feels soooo 1984 to me.