They'll make us pay for sunlight if we allow it
could california wildfires be serving the 30x30 agena?
With fires raging through California, discussions about land grabs are flaring up again.
(Please pray for our friends in California if you pray… and keep praying for our friends in North Carolina… what’s happening is scary and traumatic to people in real life right now.)
It might seem paranoid if it wasn’t such a repeating pattern…
… and if there weren’t such clear and enduring motives…
Agenda 21 is United Nations 100 year long master plan for humanity. The agenda for the 21st Century. And this 100 year long agenda is then broken down into shorter 15 year long plans. The first 15 year plan was called Agenda 2015 or the Millenium Development Goals. Currently, we are living in the 2nd 15 year plan… the so-called Agenda 2030, which according to UN documents is to “transform our world for sustainable development”…You have these organizations and these environmental groups, and these different coalitions, they all go back to their respective countries and, in order to save the planet, they take advantage of the unique political and the unique legal situation in their home countries to get Agenda 2030 implemented at the local level.
For instance, right here in America, one of the biggest manifestations of this United Nations Agenda 2030 is the Biden Administrations corollary agenda, 30X30. This is a plan by the US government to take 30% of America’s land completely out of production by the year 2030, assuming that 30% of the land in this country will be placed into federal conservation and it would essentially be idle. There would be no grazing, no farming, no drilling, no fishing, no developing… basically just no human activity at all. And while the current aim is to take 30% of American land by the year 2030, once that’s actually achieved, the next step will be to take 50% of America’s land by the year 2050.
It’s sort of a rolling project with the ultimate goal being for the federal government to own the majority of the land in America and to make that land inaccessible to the people in order to of course “save the planet.”
Margaret Byfield from American Stewards of Liberty elaborates:
They’re trying to create a way to basically take the assets that are protected to then be enrolled in a private investment account for… the same people who are pushing the 30X30 agenda could profit off those protected assets. Then the rule gave management authority to the investors over all the assets that were enrolled in a natural asset company. The intent was not to make money. The intent was to gain control of the assets. We’re in a place right now in history where we have historic debt. That’s why one of the reasons for 30x30 is get more protected lands so there’s collateral to support that so that whomever’s buying America’s debt has that assurance so that if for some reason America defaults, our economy collapses or whatever the case may be, they still can go extract the mines, extract the minerals and retain their value for investing and buying America’s debt.
You can watch the interview here, or, if you can’t get past the paywall, she does another great interview on CHD’s Financial Rebellion here.
From that interview:
When “We the People” own the land, we can control our government. When they own the land, they can control us. So that’s really in a nutshell what’s behind the 30x30 agenda, is to create more protected lands out of the hands out of the hands of the people so they can do what they want with those lands.
And we saw that develop and play out with the Natural Asset Company issue that came up… at the end of last year, first of this year. That’s where we really saw it all kind of tie together because the same people who are fighting to lock up our land in 30x30 then were the same people who were trying to create an investment product through national asset companies where these products could be enrolled and they could invest in and profit from. And that’s where I think we started to see it all coming together - that all of these conservation envoronmental agendas, they’re not about the environment. They’re not about conservation.
It is absolutely and attempt to get control of the real assets. And Catherine, you said it the best in one of our conversations… they’re going after the real assets because all wealth begins with the land.
It appears they’re just getting started.
Meanwhile, consider the lies that all of this are built on…
"The notion that CO2 is pollution is absolutely preposterous... The idea that [it's] going to destroy the planet or change the temperature of the Earth is totally ludicrous…But from a totalitarian perspective, if you can convince people that CO2 is pollution, there's no human activity that doesn't result in CO2 emissions, including living, including dying, turning on a light switch."
"Every single aspect of your life, then, if we submit to the idea that CO2 is pollution, then comes under the regulatory control of the people who claim to be saving us from pollution."
We’re not a game. It’s upsetting to me that people I care about are displaced or injured or struggling because we’re being played like Monopoly pieces.
But also, it’s on us to remember that so we don’t start acclimating to their pathology. I get caught up sometimes. But we have souls. We can pray. We can heal and love and be inspired and evolve. That’s a pretty strong advantage.
There’s more to us than everything that can be taken away. I get that we still don’t want to lose everything… but we won’t. It’s the illusions that are crumbling the fastest.
Hoping you’re someplace safe. Sending you love.
Thank-you Ann.
We do need to understand the what and how, about the eugenicists and their work. Still, I would like to see more focus on our creative endeavors to build a new and fresh system for understanding this world. Unfortunately it is much easier to catalogue the ills of the old than it is to create something new where understanding is near nil because there is no unifying theory for the new observations. We still need to lay the foundation if we are to build the world more to our liking. The idea given to me is that we all carry the same incorrect assumption about the nature of reality. Both religious and secular folk all believe (assume) that the spiritual and the physical are fundamentally different. What if they are not? We will never know if we do not look or examine the question.
Interested in any thoughts you have about caring for the natural world of which we're a part. How youd see moving forward, in addition to critique.