We do need to understand the what and how, about the eugenicists and their work. Still, I would like to see more focus on our creative endeavors to build a new and fresh system for understanding this world. Unfortunately it is much easier to catalogue the ills of the old than it is to create something new where understanding is near nil because there is no unifying theory for the new observations. We still need to lay the foundation if we are to build the world more to our liking. The idea given to me is that we all carry the same incorrect assumption about the nature of reality. Both religious and secular folk all believe (assume) that the spiritual and the physical are fundamentally different. What if they are not? We will never know if we do not look or examine the question.
Yes. I agree with you…to the extent I understand you at least. It’s part of why I’ve been posting less. My Substacks have been largely about untangling, and sometimes putting various dots together in once place to ponder in service to being informed and trying to understand what’s happening around us. But the landscape of being informed has shifted, or perhaps revealed. Clearly we have to change our approach. We’re not going to “investigative journalism” our way out of this. We need introspection. We need to heal, individually and together… get on a higher frequency together. At least that’s more of what I’ve been thinking about lately.
Can you elaborate on your thought re:spiritual vs physical?
Yes! That’s important. Ultimately I think the answers start to surface organically as we immerse ourselves in the natural world and find ways to really appreciate the brilliance and beauty of nature. This will always be a critical part of preserving it and maintaining a balance and understanding the impacts of everything that calls itself progress.
The tricky part becomes that, many people who are trying to engage in the world that way (getting sunlight, natural medicine, retreating for technology, growing food, cultivating land) are bumping right into some of the measures that are threatening those choices.
There are many groups and conferences that focus on solutions though… Weston A Price comes to mind. https://www.westonaprice.org/ for healthy living solutions. But people like Tessa Lena, Barry Brownstein and Charles Eisenberg also point to getting anchored in a better mindset/heart space. And I try to weave in some of that in some of my posts as well… although, as I mentioned in other comments, I use this Substack to untangle what I’m observing “out there,” which is often troubling.
Thanks for your great articles. Does everyone know about agenda 21 ,2030,2050 ? This is all part of the plan. During the so-called “campfires” people videotaped the fires and it led back to Smart meters , so it seems the utility companies equipment caused the wildfires. In the videos they explained everything . PG&E was held liable for involuntary manslaughter for 84 bodies . 5 G meters and towers are military weaponry being used on the people. Mark Steele, Raymond Broomhall, Barry Trower, Jerry Flynn and more. I don’t know if I’m allowed to attach videos so I’m not going to do so at this time but please research United Nation ‘s Agenda 21, 2030, 2050 . There is a group called “InPower” and worldwide people are sending notice of liability letters to governments and corporations for their crimes against humanity for the following crimes ; trespassing technology a.k.a. Smart Meters, 5 G , Geo engineering, and vaccines. It’s important people remember they work for us and like any company we must hold the employees accountable for their actions/ inactions as they took an oath to defend the Constitution no matter what.
Thank you for bringing this up and sharing that information. I’ve just been seeing posts about the possible role of smart meters in all of this. And I’ve written about the many reasons to avoid them - spontaneous fires being one. And of course 15-minute cities… Tough time to be aware. Tough time to be unaware. Painful forced evolution all around…
Eminent scientist (not politician)Edmund Wilson has long espoused a more radical proposal. Half Earth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-Earth Do you feel we humans can exist independent of the wilder world/ Do you feel humans have been good caretakers in the modern era? This is a genuine question. We differ on conclusions, so Id like to learn what informs yours. In that light, if you would cite sources you pay attention to that differ from you (ecotones, always enriching) that would be great. It's in that spirit that Im here.
I’m not sure what desired conclusions you’re attributing to me or what we differ on. It sounds like you may be supportive of Agenda 21 and WEF initiatives? If so, then yes, we have differing views about that.
I'm in learn and question mode, aiming to stay open to useful solutions (vs any prior mindset). In that light, Ive long appreciated Wilson's call for 'Half Earth, as it speaks to balancing the aggressive human overwhelming of natural systems since we gained the tools of the industrial revolution (at least), and maybe to the attitudes beyond that - not certain about that part. Opposition to Project 30 x30 then gets my attention. I'm sure you're not opposed just to oppose it, and it sure seems you value the earth beyond the humans on it. So, my interest in the questions above,
I appreciate where you're coming from. Learn and question mode is great. Sadly, I think it's one of the things that is lacking within the WEF, UN and many agencies that have failed to revisit agendas that they've been pushing for a very long time. I suspect that many of us share a love of nature and the planet and a desire to protect and preserve it. And many of us are willing to make various sacrifices and efforts to achieve these goals. However, I believe these agencies have become predatory as they embrace increasingly Machiavellian approaches to achieving their stated goals as they poach and exploit earnest efforts and ideas. (I recommend watching videos of some of these people speaking at Davos and other WEF forums.)
This is why we see the agendas becoming infiltrated with lucrative "solutions" that coast on our ideals, but, in practice, work against them. For example, these agencies continue to work on vaccine hesitancy in the name of public health while burying, censoring, denying very real injuries and deaths that linked to the products they continue to push. To this end, they also stoke pandemic fears and distort/manipulate real disease risks vs. the real risk/benefits of medical interventions. (Meanwhile, we have veterans with PTSD and people disabled by vaccines being offered medically assisted deaths.)
Same for climate "solutions." Offshore wind is proving to be more expensive, less fruitful and more harmful to wildlife and the environment than promised while industry profits and grows, yet these things aren't being revisited. The negative impacts of solar farms, EMF, surveillance, smart cities are ignored as they're pushed forward with the same talking points. And you can find many of the people who push these things well situated to benefit on the back end.
Meanwhile, we see the same people who push these ideas modeling entirely different behaviors than the ones they push on the general public.
There are many legitimate reasons for resistance to "sustainable development goals" and other agendas that claim to be solutions to global problems. I think anyone who is serious about solving the problems should be willing to explore them.
The idea that you share sounds interesting in theory. I just haven’t seen a way of applying it that doesn’t include some serious collateral damage that would negate the purpose. (If we have to sacrifice or disregard the lives of millions of humans, animals and trees for the good of the planet, what are we saving?) Perhaps as we all do some healing work of our own, viable solutions and applications will surface. I suspect we have the do the spiritual work before we're collectively in the right heart space to create meaningful change.
Thank-you Ann.
We do need to understand the what and how, about the eugenicists and their work. Still, I would like to see more focus on our creative endeavors to build a new and fresh system for understanding this world. Unfortunately it is much easier to catalogue the ills of the old than it is to create something new where understanding is near nil because there is no unifying theory for the new observations. We still need to lay the foundation if we are to build the world more to our liking. The idea given to me is that we all carry the same incorrect assumption about the nature of reality. Both religious and secular folk all believe (assume) that the spiritual and the physical are fundamentally different. What if they are not? We will never know if we do not look or examine the question.
Yes. I agree with you…to the extent I understand you at least. It’s part of why I’ve been posting less. My Substacks have been largely about untangling, and sometimes putting various dots together in once place to ponder in service to being informed and trying to understand what’s happening around us. But the landscape of being informed has shifted, or perhaps revealed. Clearly we have to change our approach. We’re not going to “investigative journalism” our way out of this. We need introspection. We need to heal, individually and together… get on a higher frequency together. At least that’s more of what I’ve been thinking about lately.
Can you elaborate on your thought re:spiritual vs physical?
Interested in any thoughts you have about caring for the natural world of which we're a part. How youd see moving forward, in addition to critique.
(agenda etymology + 'things to be done".)
Yes! That’s important. Ultimately I think the answers start to surface organically as we immerse ourselves in the natural world and find ways to really appreciate the brilliance and beauty of nature. This will always be a critical part of preserving it and maintaining a balance and understanding the impacts of everything that calls itself progress.
The tricky part becomes that, many people who are trying to engage in the world that way (getting sunlight, natural medicine, retreating for technology, growing food, cultivating land) are bumping right into some of the measures that are threatening those choices.
There are many groups and conferences that focus on solutions though… Weston A Price comes to mind. https://www.westonaprice.org/ for healthy living solutions. But people like Tessa Lena, Barry Brownstein and Charles Eisenberg also point to getting anchored in a better mindset/heart space. And I try to weave in some of that in some of my posts as well… although, as I mentioned in other comments, I use this Substack to untangle what I’m observing “out there,” which is often troubling.
Thanks for your great articles. Does everyone know about agenda 21 ,2030,2050 ? This is all part of the plan. During the so-called “campfires” people videotaped the fires and it led back to Smart meters , so it seems the utility companies equipment caused the wildfires. In the videos they explained everything . PG&E was held liable for involuntary manslaughter for 84 bodies . 5 G meters and towers are military weaponry being used on the people. Mark Steele, Raymond Broomhall, Barry Trower, Jerry Flynn and more. I don’t know if I’m allowed to attach videos so I’m not going to do so at this time but please research United Nation ‘s Agenda 21, 2030, 2050 . There is a group called “InPower” and worldwide people are sending notice of liability letters to governments and corporations for their crimes against humanity for the following crimes ; trespassing technology a.k.a. Smart Meters, 5 G , Geo engineering, and vaccines. It’s important people remember they work for us and like any company we must hold the employees accountable for their actions/ inactions as they took an oath to defend the Constitution no matter what.
Thank you for bringing this up and sharing that information. I’ve just been seeing posts about the possible role of smart meters in all of this. And I’ve written about the many reasons to avoid them - spontaneous fires being one. And of course 15-minute cities… Tough time to be aware. Tough time to be unaware. Painful forced evolution all around…
This 5-minute video explains the agenda. https://x.com/fifgen_goygrant/status/1877786071846547639?s=46&t=-xsbZr7fgsWv9d6hQ8hFVg
You’re 🤪🤪🤪
Eminent scientist (not politician)Edmund Wilson has long espoused a more radical proposal. Half Earth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-Earth Do you feel we humans can exist independent of the wilder world/ Do you feel humans have been good caretakers in the modern era? This is a genuine question. We differ on conclusions, so Id like to learn what informs yours. In that light, if you would cite sources you pay attention to that differ from you (ecotones, always enriching) that would be great. It's in that spirit that Im here.
I’m not sure what desired conclusions you’re attributing to me or what we differ on. It sounds like you may be supportive of Agenda 21 and WEF initiatives? If so, then yes, we have differing views about that.
I'm in learn and question mode, aiming to stay open to useful solutions (vs any prior mindset). In that light, Ive long appreciated Wilson's call for 'Half Earth, as it speaks to balancing the aggressive human overwhelming of natural systems since we gained the tools of the industrial revolution (at least), and maybe to the attitudes beyond that - not certain about that part. Opposition to Project 30 x30 then gets my attention. I'm sure you're not opposed just to oppose it, and it sure seems you value the earth beyond the humans on it. So, my interest in the questions above,
I appreciate where you're coming from. Learn and question mode is great. Sadly, I think it's one of the things that is lacking within the WEF, UN and many agencies that have failed to revisit agendas that they've been pushing for a very long time. I suspect that many of us share a love of nature and the planet and a desire to protect and preserve it. And many of us are willing to make various sacrifices and efforts to achieve these goals. However, I believe these agencies have become predatory as they embrace increasingly Machiavellian approaches to achieving their stated goals as they poach and exploit earnest efforts and ideas. (I recommend watching videos of some of these people speaking at Davos and other WEF forums.)
This is why we see the agendas becoming infiltrated with lucrative "solutions" that coast on our ideals, but, in practice, work against them. For example, these agencies continue to work on vaccine hesitancy in the name of public health while burying, censoring, denying very real injuries and deaths that linked to the products they continue to push. To this end, they also stoke pandemic fears and distort/manipulate real disease risks vs. the real risk/benefits of medical interventions. (Meanwhile, we have veterans with PTSD and people disabled by vaccines being offered medically assisted deaths.)
Same for climate "solutions." Offshore wind is proving to be more expensive, less fruitful and more harmful to wildlife and the environment than promised while industry profits and grows, yet these things aren't being revisited. The negative impacts of solar farms, EMF, surveillance, smart cities are ignored as they're pushed forward with the same talking points. And you can find many of the people who push these things well situated to benefit on the back end.
Meanwhile, we see the same people who push these ideas modeling entirely different behaviors than the ones they push on the general public.
There are many legitimate reasons for resistance to "sustainable development goals" and other agendas that claim to be solutions to global problems. I think anyone who is serious about solving the problems should be willing to explore them.
The idea that you share sounds interesting in theory. I just haven’t seen a way of applying it that doesn’t include some serious collateral damage that would negate the purpose. (If we have to sacrifice or disregard the lives of millions of humans, animals and trees for the good of the planet, what are we saving?) Perhaps as we all do some healing work of our own, viable solutions and applications will surface. I suspect we have the do the spiritual work before we're collectively in the right heart space to create meaningful change.
Can I comment?
Yes, of course.