What happens when aerosol, self-spreading vaccines are introduced to a pandemaddicted world with "relaxed" informed consent guidelines and geoengineering?
It’s time to start asking ourselves what self-spreading vaccines, geoengineering, the hunt for DiseaseX (using PCR tests), and the FDA’s “relaxed” informed consent guidelines might share in common.
This 24-minute segment by The Highwire paints an alarming (and well-sourced) picture.
In 2018, almost a year to the day before Johns Hopkins had Event 201 - which was a fictitious coronavirus that swept across the world and caused all kinds of lockdowns and deaths – one year before that they start searching for these great new technologies. One of the key ones is this, I’ll read it straight from the report:
“Self-spreading vaccines – also known as transmissible or self-propagating vaccines – are genetically engineered to move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection.”
…Now fast forward. The world has heard of COVID. We’re searching for a vaccine. It’s 2020. The Telegraph puts out this article: Could self-spreading vaccines stop a coronavirus pandemic?
“Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at John’s Hopkins University, says the outbreak of coronavirus may have come too soon for the technology.
Dr. Adalja says the method of vaccination will throw serious medical ethics questions. His view is endorsed by the Department of Health, which explored the technology in a presentation late last year.
In a study from November, the department stated that self-spreading techniques could eliminate ‘vaccine delay.’”
…The presentation also stated the vaccines did very little harm in comparison to a pandemic. However the department highlighted a number of ethical issues that arise with self-spreading vaccines. One of which is that it is “less lethal”, not “non-lethal” meaning it can still kill.
“Some people will die who otherwise would have lived, even though fewer people die overall,” it stated. (emphasis mine)
Jeffrey Jaxen goes on to paint a picture of how lawmakers and regulatory agencies with clear conflicts of interest are paving the way for green-lighting, fast-tracking and loopholes around informed consent.
And informed consent is a big deal here. Because, with self-spreading technology, once the vax is out of the bag, there’s no way to control it. (Remember when the release of gmo mosquitos “yielded unintended consequences”?)
The potential result? Think Contagion, but with aerosol vaccines. (interesting that even in the fictional tale, there’s speculation about weaponizing bird flu).
Because it kind of feels like the people doing Mad $cience want to make it contagious to get to the people who won’t comply.
In a recent update, ICAN’s Aaron Siri explained that, since the segment aired in February, one of the vaccine producers, Autonomous Therapeutics (even the name creeps me out), has rebranded it’s products as “precision medicines.”
Consider what Dr. Ariel Weinberger, the CEO and founder of Autonomous Therapeutics, and Dr. Timothy Notton, the chief scientific officer, wrote in a paper they co-authored in 2014.
Infectious disease control faces significant challenges including: how to therapeutically target the highest-risk populations, circumvent behavioral barriers, and overcome pathogen persistence and resistance mechanisms. We review a recently proposed solution to overcome these challenges: antivirals that transmit by 'piggybacking' on viral replication. (emphasis mine)
Behavioral barriers…
Aerosol Self-Amplifying Vaccines
You’ll often hear aerosol vaccines discussed as nasal sprays.
But $cience is already thinking bigger.
A self-amplifying mRNA shot, as the name implies, contains the equipment needed to make more of itself once it enters cells. You do this by not only injecting the mRNA for the antigen of interest (such as one that encodes the coronavirus spike protein) but also mRNAs that get translated into replicase proteins that will in turn produce more of the mRNA species.
Great.
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (sponsored by Open Philanthropy) and representatives from pharmaceutical companies, industry trade groups and the federal government, were examining the potential of self-amplifying RNA vaccines at a Vaccine Platforms Workshop in 2018.
Here’s one of their their conclusions…
An mRNA-based vaccine platform technique appears particularly promising in terms of ease of manufacture, adaptability to various targets, and biological delivery.
They also concluded that NGOs and government support would be necessary to help launch these platforms because emerging infectious disease is not profitable enough…
Platform vaccine technologies, like all other emerging infectious disease (EID) medical countermeasures (MCMs), require special considerations given market conditions. Despite the economies of scale achievable via platform-based approaches, EIDs, by their very nature, will never represent a major market with large financial rewards and minimal opportunity costs. Dedicated programs by governments, nongovernment organizations, and philanthropies will likely play major roles for the foreseeable future in the development, uptake, and use of vaccine platform technologies. (emphasis mine)
Hmm…
What else were they mistaken about?
Much of the current discussion on the benefits of platforms centers disproportionately on aspirations that the regulatory process will be streamlined, but there is no plan for such a streamlining at this time.
Cut to December 2023 …
This final rule allows an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than minimal risk to the human subject and includes appropriate safeguards to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of human subjects. The final rule permits an institutional review board (IRB) to waive or alter certain informed consent elements or to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent, under limited conditions, for certain FDA-regulated minimal risk clinical investigations.
https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2023-27935.pdf
Funny how the obstacles (that protect people) are quietly removed.
Engineering Fear and Narrative
How does this nonsense keep happening each time an insanely dangerous new mad science measure is introduced? The playbook typically involves a fear-induced campaign to bolster up an argument for “necessity,” generally involving an “emergency” along with a minimizing of risks of new mad science.
Along with lying. And secrecy.
The Pandemic Olympics
Stoking public health fear typically involves watching “deadly viruses” compete for case counts.
Pandemics are made of cases. And cases are made of testing and presumption.
So public health authorities set guidelines for “presumptive diagnosis” and are testing everything under the sun in search of the next emergency, using PCR technology that - according to PCR inventor Kary Mullis - has the ability to essentially create something out of nothing and should NOT be used for diagnosis.
“With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody” Kary Mullis
…On August 7. 2019, just about 3 months before the first utterance of COVID-19, Kary Mullis, age 74, a Nobel Prize winner, inventore of the PCR test, a man who was once willing and eager to expose Anthony Fauci, quietly died of pneumonia.
Pandemic Contenders
Bird flu, Dengue, MPox, Marburg, Ebola, the next Covid variant and others... are all vying (with the help of public health and regulatory agencies) to be the next DiseaseX. It’s almost as though mainstream and social media are running test marketing campaigns to see what we fear most before they chose a winner.
Simultaneously, vaccines are produced and stockpiled as emergencies are declared.
Absence of Introspection
Unfortunately, none of the folks raising the alarms and making decisions for all of us are willing to go back and revisit the negative repercussions of their efforts in earnest.
Consider some of the elephants in the room…
The same people who credit Ebola vaccines with “reducing case counts”…
… fail to consider that worst Ebola outbreaks in history coincide with the clinical trials (of the shedding vaccine) that were used to launch them…
Interestingly, the approval of Ervebo was supported by a study conducted in Guinea during the 2014-2016 outbreak that resulted in more than 28,000 cases and more than 11,000 deaths. By far the worst outbreak in reported history. Given that Ervebo is a live virus vaccine that sheds, is it possible that the vaccination study contributed to the outbreak?
I can’t answer that question, but when I looked up the only other documented outbreak with numbers in the thousands - the 2018-2020 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (3481 cases and 2299 deaths) - it overlaps with another ebola vaccine study, initiated on May 21, 2018.
Following the April 2018 reemergence of Ebola in a rural region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the virus spread to an urban center by early May. Within 2 wk of the first case confirmation, a vaccination campaign was initiated in which 3,017 doses were administered to contacts of cases and frontline healthcare workers.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1817329116
(Incidentally, Remdesivir was tested as a potential therapeutic for EBV amidst the 2018-2020 outbreak and demonstrated its ability be more deadly that navigating the virus without treatment.)
And what about the potential role of gain-of-function research (done in the name of biosecurity) in these pandemics?
And then, of course, there’s the COVID vaccine fiasco…
Which brings us to Geoengineering…
Geoengineering, chemtrails, stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), solar radiation management, weather modification… Whatever you want to call it, none of this is new. Our government has been working on this technology for many decades. And there’s a long history of secrecy, deceit and medical ethics violations here.
(11:00) Project Popeye had opened the door to a new and dangerous type of warfare.
“Some said, if you can control the weather, then you can control the world. Military planners imagined loading the clouds with radiological, biological or chemical agents and having them rain on demand.”
You could attack your enemy using the weather, but deny ever doing so.
Here’s a patent for aerosolized genetic vaccines assigned to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from 2010.
Here’s another patent filed by the CDC and HHS in 2005 for aerosol delivery systems for “various types of agents, such as a vaccine or other types of pharmaceutical substances.”
Given current “relaxed” informed consent requirements for clinical trials, what are the odds these agencies will refrain from using this technology to provide a “safe and effective” vaccine to a vulnerable population during a global “emergency”?
"Self-spreading vaccines" sounds a whole lot like "poisoning the environment". It's also a step beyond herd mentality, where clearly no amount of possible side effects are of any concern to the people doing it. It's not just that you won't have a choice, but even that the people that would have a medical allergy (or drug interaction issue) would no longer have a choice either. Tough-luck to the herd, only those that can tolerate the poison will survive, I suppose.
Exactly! I’m very concerned about this. They’re playing us like a “survival of the fittest” board game.